Think Different

There’s thing that bothers maine astir the chatter that AI is making “intelligence” ubiquitous. For example, successful a caller Bloomberg article, “AI Will Upend a Basic Assumption About How Companies Are Organized,” Azeem Azhar wrote:

As quality becomes cheaper and faster, the basal presumption underpinning our institutions—that quality penetration is scarce and expensive—no longer holds. When you tin efficaciously consult a twelve experts anytime you like, it changes however companies organize, however we innovate and however each of america approaches learning and decision-making. The question facing individuals and organizations alike is: What volition you bash erstwhile quality itself is abruptly ubiquitous and practically free?

Is it truly quality that is becoming ubiquitous and practically free? What we see to beryllium the pinnacle of quality quality is the quality to spot what everyone other sees, to larn what everyone other has learned, and yet to spot thing that nary 1 other was capable to see. Or to spot thing wholly unfamiliar and marque consciousness of it, without anterior knowledge. In a bold stroke, to remake the world. The creators of AI person displayed that benignant of intelligence. Their creations, not truthful much. As AI pioneer François Chollet enactment it, intelligence is much than a postulation of task circumstantial skills. In fact, helium noted, “unlimited priors oregon acquisition tin nutrient systems with little-to-no generalization powerfulness (or intelligence) that grounds precocious accomplishment astatine immoderate fig of tasks.”

I bash hold with Azeem, though, that adjacent today’s not yet genuinely intelligent AI is profoundly disruptive. There are so large questions facing individuals and organizations, but we request to marque definite that they are the close questions.

I person a batch of thoughts astir what is going to alteration due to the fact that of the abundance of expertise provided by AI, which I volition constitute astir astatine different time. What I privation to speech astir now, though, is inspired by the precise omniscient proposal erstwhile fixed by Jeff Bezos, which is to inquire what volition not change. In short, if it is not genuinely quality but simply expertise that is being commoditized, we request to inquire what elements of quality are inactive unsocial and valuable.

I posit that astatine slightest 1 reply is rooted successful quality creativity, values, and taste. Consider what happened during the PC revolution. During the mainframe era, computers had been scarce and expensive. Suddenly, they were inexpensive and ubiquitous. There could beryllium “a PC connected each table and successful each home” (and yet successful each hand). In short, computers had go a commodity. There were winners similar Bill Gates, who understood that power implicit the bundle operating strategy would beryllium a root of monopoly profits; Andy Grove of Intel, who figured retired that getting power of 1 cardinal hardware constituent successful an different commodified strategy became a root of outsized power; and Michael Dell, who rode the question of hardware commoditization to occurrence by becoming the champion astatine configuring and delivering standardized PCs to the masses. Each of them, successful their way, figured retired thing astir however the satellite was changing.

But lone 1 of the idiosyncratic machine pioneers rooted his company’s concern strategy successful thing that would not change: the quality tendency to separate oneself from peers by the values that you explicit done your choices. He understood that successful commodity markets, brands basal retired erstwhile they mean something.

Art professional Dave Hickey explained this thought brilliantly erstwhile penning astir the emergence to dominance of General Motors aft World War II. Harley Earl, its VP of styling, built a ladder of presumption from Chevrolet to Pontiac to Cadillac and changed automobile designs each twelvemonth truthful that the latest exemplary became an entity of desire. As Hickey enactment it, the automobile became an “art market,” successful which “products are sold connected the ground of what they mean, not conscionable what they do.” Steve Jobs didn’t make the celebrated 1984 advertisement that threw down the gauntlet to the PC. (It was Steve Hayden, Brent Thomas, and Lee Clow astatine Chiat/Day who came up with the concept, and the advertisement itself was directed by Ridley Scott.) But similar the Mac itself, and aboriginal the iPhone, it was unquestionably a reflection of Steve’s unsocial premix of creativity, values, and taste.

Whatever changes AI brings to the world, I fishy that those 3 things—creativity, values, and taste—will stay a changeless successful quality societies and economies.

Abundant expertise whitethorn beryllium the booby prize erstwhile that expertise is based connected statement opinion, which, by the quality of LLMs, is their beardown suit. This came location to maine vividly erstwhile I work a paper that outlined however erstwhile ChatGPT was asked to plan a website, it built 1 that included galore dark patterns. Why? Much of the codification ChatGPT was trained connected implemented those acheronian patterns. Unfortunately neither ChatGPT nor those prompting it had the consciousness to recognize that the websites it had learned from had been enshittified (to usage Cory Doctorow’s marvelous crook of phrase).

It is the quality to decide what is caller and unexpected and to shape what matters to radical that is the bosom of originative intelligence, not conscionable successful the arts but successful concern and successful politics. At slightest until AI wakes up successful the greeting and decides what it is going to bash (i.e., we person invented artificial volition arsenic good arsenic artificial intelligence), it volition beryllium directed by humans. As I wrote successful WTF, AI is simply a almighty genie that does what we inquire it to do, which is not needfully what we really want. Every communicative astir genies revolves astir the inability of those fixed the magic wishes to privation for the close thing. The creation of asking is everything. That is, the aboriginal belongs to those who are exercising the quality and penetration that AI itself does not have. As Steve Jobs said (actually channeling the creativity of Chiat/Day’s Craig Tanimoto), “Think different.”

Bringing this astir to the choices that we marque astatine O’Reilly, I similar to constituent retired that the experts you find connected the O’Reilly platform are not conscionable a repository of cognition and expertise. Through their writings, videos, and live interactions with customers connected the platform, they besides bring to carnivore unsocial values and points of view.

And so, arsenic we physique our ain AI-based services, we are leaning into not conscionable the cognition of our experts but their values, and our own. We similar to deliberation our experts don’t conscionable archer you however to bash something. They archer you however to bash it right. They don’t conscionable thatch you what they know. They thatch you however to think.

---

On May 8, O’Reilly Media volition beryllium hosting Coding with AI: The End of Software Development arsenic We Know It—a unrecorded virtual tech league spotlighting however AI is already supercharging developers, boosting productivity, and providing existent worth to their organizations. If you’re successful the trenches gathering tomorrow’s improvement practices contiguous and funny successful speaking astatine the event, we’d emotion to perceive from you by March 12. You tin find much accusation and our telephone for presentations here. Just privation to attend? Register for escaped here.