Coming into Andor play two, we learned the astonishing information that 1 large returning quality successful the play would no longer beryllium played by their bequest actor. This week, we learned precisely who it was—and astatine a clip erstwhile Star Wars has recovered itself connected diverging paths erstwhile it comes to opening up classical characters to caller actors, it proved precisely wherefore sometimes that is the champion accidental to supply caller perspectives and interpretations successful the postulation far, acold away.
We learn, of course, in Andor play two’s 2nd act that that bequest fig is nary different than Senator Bail Organa, who, aft being played by Jimmy Smits crossed the prequel movies and astir recently Obi-Wan Kenobi, is played present by Benjamin Bratt (voice acting fable Phil LaMarr stepped successful for Clone Wars and Rebels, truthful it’s not similar this is the archetypal clip we’ve seen idiosyncratic other instrumentality connected Bail). Andor creator Tony Gilroy has already gone connected the grounds for the elemental crushed for the recast—Smits’ docket didn’t align with accumulation connected play two, truthful the recast was retired of necessity owed to Bail’s value to the narrative, alternatively than retired of a conscious determination to regenerate Smits.
While it mightiness beryllium a small jarring to Star Wars fans astatine first, Bratt effortlessly glides into Bail’s quality successful the little moments we conscionable him talking to Mon Mothma successful the events of the season’s sixth episode, “What a Festive Evening.” Even if it wasn’t a conscious decision, the recast comes astatine a fascinating clip for Star Wars and its attack to bequest characters. As characters ping-pong betwixt animated origins and live-action debuts, arsenic the franchise becomes much and much consenting to bring backmost actors to re-inhabit their bequest roles, Star Wars is ever grappling with whether it needs to recast oregon instrumentality to a acquainted look arsenic it plays with these progressively important characters. Of course, Andor itself has explored this already successful immoderate mode with Genevieve O’Reilly’s Mon Mothma, herself paradoxically some a recast (replacing Return of the Jedi‘s Caroline Blakiston) and a returning bequest actor, having played Mon successful chopped scenes from Revenge of the Sith earlier returning in Rogue One, Rebels, and eventually Andor and Ahsoka.
But it is just to accidental for arsenic overmuch arsenic it has occasionally recast roles, Star Wars arsenic of precocious is progressively much funny successful bringing radical back, seemingly astatine immoderate cost. Just arsenic Rogue One has brought backmost O’Reilly’s Mon Mothma, it besides gave america the archetypal important integer facsimiles successful Grand Moff Tarkin and a young Princess Leia. As overmuch arsenic Ahsoka was defined by recasting live-action iterations of animated characters, it is present besides a bid intrinsically tied to Hayden Christensen’s return to the relation of Anakin Skywalker. In akin ways, The Mandalorian and The Book of Boba Fett went a measurement further successful bringing backmost a post-Return of the Jedi Luke Skywalker arsenic an amalgam of Mark Hamill’s performance, assemblage treble Scott Lang, and some vocal and VFX exertion to make a integer facsimile of an era-appropriate Hamill.

In immoderate ways, this schoolhouse of thought is not adjacent needfully astir keeping Star Wars storytelling successful the orbit of these acquainted figures from the Skywalker saga, but intrinsically keeping circumstantial interpretations of these characters arsenic the definitive version, nary substance what has to beryllium done to support that interpretation’s status. Even putting speech the communicative concerns of it all, would The Mandalorian and The Book of Boba Fett mislaid thing successful casting a caller young histrion arsenic Luke Skywalker alternatively of these awkward integer homunculus we got? Was Solo truly that overmuch of a interest to Lucasfilm that the risk of recasting its astir important figures was considered excessively overmuch erstwhile more?
But Star Wars storytelling has likewise likewise thrived erstwhile it’s allowed caller interpretations of bequest characters, retired of necessity oregon otherwise, to beryllium on their classical counterparts. After all, without a tendency to recast we wouldn’t person things similar Sam Witwer’s Darth Maul, oregon Matt Lanter and James Arnold Taylor’s Anakin and Obi-Wan in Clone Wars, versions of those characters that are arguably present astir arsenic important arsenic their live-action progenitors. We wouldn’t have, arsenic we said, O’Reilly’s re-imagination of Mon Mothma, oregon Forest Whitaker’s improvement of Saw Gererra. Not lone did putting religion successful these actors to lend their ain rotation to Star Wars stalwarts make new, likewise beloved interpretations of those characters, it besides trained Star Wars fans to judge the logistical and storytelling world that aggregate versions and interpretations of these characters can, and should, co-exist alongside each other.
No one’s brains truly broke accepting the information that Clone Wars‘ Anakin and Obi-Wan were meant to beryllium the aforesaid radical we met in Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith. Bratt’s mentation of Bail Organa mightiness beryllium much of a daze simply due to the fact that we’ve seen Smits successful the relation for truthful long, and truthful precocious arsenic well, but it is simply portion of that aforesaid legacy. Sometimes it is bully to spot those acquainted faces: but if Star Wars is to thrive, and grow, and sometimes adjacent determination beyond those faces, we should ever beryllium unfastened to the thought of different definite constituent of view.
Want much io9 news? Check retired erstwhile to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s adjacent for the DC Universe connected movie and TV, and everything you request to cognize astir the aboriginal of Doctor Who.